Well Expertise



|
Report No.
|
1735 |
|
Type of audit
|
Internal Audits |
|
Auditee/Customer
|
Well Expertise |
|
Date
|
2018/04/13 |
|
Findings
|
9 |
|
Status
|
Closed |
Verification Report- Well Expertise- Marine Traffic Surveillance Center – Implementation, Testing and Service Deliverables
Summary
activities are based on presentations, examples and a dialogue-approach where feedback has been given during
and after each meeting. Initial meeting to go through plans for system implementation and testing held in
February 2018. In the meeting verbal feedback and improvement suggestions were given from auditors.
An initial verification of interface, communication and roles in a ship collision case was conducted through a ER
table top with WE marine operations manager, Wellesley 3rd line representatives, 2nd line ER OFFB
representatives, Transocean rig OIM and 2 stability section leads and standby vessel captain was conducted April
10th. [….] Final readiness review at WE MSC were conducted April 13th. Participants were from Well Expertise, Faroe
Petroleum and Wellesley Petroleum. The scope was to check readiness status based on the overall audit
objectives.
Findings
-
2.1.1. Acceptance test plan.
o The acceptance test plan should be finished prior to 1st Wellesley well
o A detailed plan with scope, including installation of system should be established
o 1 week trial (in Åmøyfjorden ?) prior to start-up, review historical AIS data vs. alarm/notifications
should be executed
o Plans for thorough and frequent health checks and system status should be established -
2.1.3. MSC Risk Assessment
o Perform and document a risk assessment for MSC deliverables
o Scenario-based risk assessment covering what if in higher risk operations (well test, reservoir
drilling), the total Smartblue system not functioning, Satelite link between rig and onshore MSC is
down, etc? -
2.1.3. MSC Risk Assessment
o Perform and document a risk assessment for MSC deliverables
o Scenario-based risk assessment covering what if in higher risk operations (well test, reservoir
drilling), the total Smartblue system not functioning, Satelite link between rig and onshore MSC is
down, etc? -
2.1.4. MSC Draft Manual
o Evaluate creating a ‘How WE…’-type procedure to describe deliverables and requirements. This to
harmonise with overall WE management system.
o Cross reference to ‘How WE Resource Project’ to cover training and familiarisation of MSC duty
and to the MSC job description -
Familiarisation and introduction plan:
oThe plan is not finalisedA bridging document between rig-standby vessel – MSC should be established and implemented
o Roles, communication, alerts, interfaces should be defined
o Levels of introduction needed for key roles – MSC duty, rig OIM/barge master, standby vessels
captains, others and how to brief them should be defined and executed
o Document assessment of PSV & SBV roles handover routines -
2.1.5. Performance Review after 1st Wellesley well
o Implementation and system verification, incl. GDPS for future location verification
o Notifications and alerts during well, location specific history
o Learnings for well 2 -
2.1.6. Offshore Drilling Engineer Role
o Evaluate experiences with including offshore DE’s in running the system
o Health checks, system and hardware knowledge (offshore and onshore) -
2.1.7. NOFO Familiarisation
o For a possible future inclusion of oil spill radar signals and detection, present system and the
possibilities to NOFO -
2.1.8. Smartblue vs Vissim/Statoil Marine
o Perform a GAP analysis to document comparison exercise
Additional Documentation
Verification-Report-WE-Marine-Surveillance-Center_13.04.18.pdf
New Audit Report
\n
Well Expertise



|
Report No.
|
1735 |
|
Type of audit
|
Internal Audits |
|
Auditee/Customer
|
Well Expertise |
|
Date
|
2018/04/13 |
|
Findings
|
9 |
|
Status
|
Closed |
Verification Report- Well Expertise- Marine Traffic Surveillance Center – Implementation, Testing and Service Deliverables
Summary
activities are based on presentations, examples and a dialogue-approach where feedback has been given during
and after each meeting. Initial meeting to go through plans for system implementation and testing held in
February 2018. In the meeting verbal feedback and improvement suggestions were given from auditors.
An initial verification of interface, communication and roles in a ship collision case was conducted through a ER
table top with WE marine operations manager, Wellesley 3rd line representatives, 2nd line ER OFFB
representatives, Transocean rig OIM and 2 stability section leads and standby vessel captain was conducted April
10th. [….] Final readiness review at WE MSC were conducted April 13th. Participants were from Well Expertise, Faroe
Petroleum and Wellesley Petroleum. The scope was to check readiness status based on the overall audit
objectives.
Findings
-
2.1.1. Acceptance test plan.
o The acceptance test plan should be finished prior to 1st Wellesley well
o A detailed plan with scope, including installation of system should be established
o 1 week trial (in Åmøyfjorden ?) prior to start-up, review historical AIS data vs. alarm/notifications
should be executed
o Plans for thorough and frequent health checks and system status should be established -
2.1.3. MSC Risk Assessment
o Perform and document a risk assessment for MSC deliverables
o Scenario-based risk assessment covering what if in higher risk operations (well test, reservoir
drilling), the total Smartblue system not functioning, Satelite link between rig and onshore MSC is
down, etc? -
2.1.3. MSC Risk Assessment
o Perform and document a risk assessment for MSC deliverables
o Scenario-based risk assessment covering what if in higher risk operations (well test, reservoir
drilling), the total Smartblue system not functioning, Satelite link between rig and onshore MSC is
down, etc? -
2.1.4. MSC Draft Manual
o Evaluate creating a ‘How WE…’-type procedure to describe deliverables and requirements. This to
harmonise with overall WE management system.
o Cross reference to ‘How WE Resource Project’ to cover training and familiarisation of MSC duty
and to the MSC job description -
Familiarisation and introduction plan:
oThe plan is not finalisedA bridging document between rig-standby vessel – MSC should be established and implemented
o Roles, communication, alerts, interfaces should be defined
o Levels of introduction needed for key roles – MSC duty, rig OIM/barge master, standby vessels
captains, others and how to brief them should be defined and executed
o Document assessment of PSV & SBV roles handover routines -
2.1.5. Performance Review after 1st Wellesley well
o Implementation and system verification, incl. GDPS for future location verification
o Notifications and alerts during well, location specific history
o Learnings for well 2 -
2.1.6. Offshore Drilling Engineer Role
o Evaluate experiences with including offshore DE’s in running the system
o Health checks, system and hardware knowledge (offshore and onshore) -
2.1.7. NOFO Familiarisation
o For a possible future inclusion of oil spill radar signals and detection, present system and the
possibilities to NOFO -
2.1.8. Smartblue vs Vissim/Statoil Marine
o Perform a GAP analysis to document comparison exercise
Additional Documentation
Verification-Report-WE-Marine-Surveillance-Center_13.04.18.pdf