WE Report

Audits



Well Expertise

No person selected

Report No.

3414
Well Management Services – Petrolia NOCO

Type of audit

Internal Audits
Well Expertise

Auditee/Customer

Well Expertise
Petrolia NOCO

Date

2022/02/22

1385 days ago

Findings

4
Number of findings

Status

Closed
Internal Audits


Well Management Services – Petrolia NOCO
Summary

Proactima carried out an audit of WE as a provider of well management services on behalf of Petrolia Noco (PNO).
The overall objective of the audit was to ensure that WE can deliver well management services with organizational robustness, necessary capacity, and competence to PNO

Findings

  • Non-Conformity

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    Area of responsibility, and competence requirements for
    the role of marine representative in a well project are not described as required.

    Include the role of marine representative in the competence matrix so that the competence requirements can be clarified, and a formal competence assessment can be performed.

    The area of responsibility for the role as marine representative in the governing document WE-M-PDP-MA-01 – How WE
    Resource projects need to be
    documented, to ensure that personnel are qualified for their role and are familiar with their main responsibilities in
    a well project, and amend the mismatch in descriptions of
    the Marine project role
    where it is called Marine Operations Coordinator, and the project organisation chart role of Marine Advisor.

    Increase redundancy and robustness in Marine Advisor role by securing a backup resource. If external resource (MarineHub), include requirement for formal
    induction, training, WE familiarization should be considered.

    Has included Rune Smenes (our stand-in Marine Advisor) in our Competence Matrix. Rune is a former employee of Well Expertise and has all the requirements needed to perform tasks as Marine Advisor. Rune is also familiar with the governing documents in Well Expertise, but do however, require a refresher in the latest BMS documents at the earliest convenience.

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    Outdated governing documents are accessible via SharePoint.

    Mark outdated versions of
    document on the front page / by watermarks or similar and/or put outdated versions in separate inaccessible folders.

    Agreed that we shall sort all outdated revisions in a “Secret/Closed folder”, and again emphasis towards our employees that the “Document register” is the best tool to use when searching for documents.
    29.11.22: All old versions of governing documents (business and services) are now made inaccessible for all employees (except Lars, Daniel and Anniken)

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    Need for a clearer definition of minor, significant and major MoC.
    No examples of what this may entail in different project phases are given.

    In WE-M-QHSE-P-01 – How WE
    Manage Risk and Change, chapter 8.1. – clarify by providing example of what facilitates a minor, significant, and major change in different project phases as e.g., rig
    move, operation, logistics, planning.
    These could also be used as basis for discussion with the operator, to achieve a shared understanding.

    WE have agreed on a new risk matrix (same as for NC and incident reporting). The MoC module needs to be updated.
    We do not see a need for providing examples of minor, significant or major changes, as the new risk matrix is very clear and intuitive.

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    It’s not clear if required courses and training programs
    in the competence matrix are required as a result of
    governmental requirements or internal requirements.

    Need for a consistent description of the unacceptable risk level throughout the document WE-M-QHSE-P-01 – How WE
    Manage Risk and Change chapter 7.1.1, 7.1.2 & App. A, It should be in line with the Risk Matrix definitions.

    29.04.22: Competence matrix is updated, but How WE Manage Risk and Change, and how WE resource projects need to be updated. These are registered as new imp. suggestions.



Additional Documentation

Well-Expertise-revisjon-for-Petrolia-Noco-Rapport-1074378-RE-02-Final.pdf


Well-Expertise-revisjon-for-Petrolia-Noco-Rapport-1074378-RE-02-Final.pdf




New Audit Report

You do not have permission to view this form.


\n


Well Expertise

No person selected

Report No.

3414
Well Management Services – Petrolia NOCO

Type of audit

Internal Audits
Well Expertise

Auditee/Customer

Well Expertise
Petrolia NOCO

Date

2022/02/22

1385 days ago

Findings

4
Number of findings

Status

Closed
Internal Audits


Well Management Services – Petrolia NOCO
Summary

Proactima carried out an audit of WE as a provider of well management services on behalf of Petrolia Noco (PNO).
The overall objective of the audit was to ensure that WE can deliver well management services with organizational robustness, necessary capacity, and competence to PNO

Findings

  • Non-Conformity

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    Area of responsibility, and competence requirements for
    the role of marine representative in a well project are not described as required.

    Include the role of marine representative in the competence matrix so that the competence requirements can be clarified, and a formal competence assessment can be performed.

    The area of responsibility for the role as marine representative in the governing document WE-M-PDP-MA-01 – How WE
    Resource projects need to be
    documented, to ensure that personnel are qualified for their role and are familiar with their main responsibilities in
    a well project, and amend the mismatch in descriptions of
    the Marine project role
    where it is called Marine Operations Coordinator, and the project organisation chart role of Marine Advisor.

    Increase redundancy and robustness in Marine Advisor role by securing a backup resource. If external resource (MarineHub), include requirement for formal
    induction, training, WE familiarization should be considered.

    Has included Rune Smenes (our stand-in Marine Advisor) in our Competence Matrix. Rune is a former employee of Well Expertise and has all the requirements needed to perform tasks as Marine Advisor. Rune is also familiar with the governing documents in Well Expertise, but do however, require a refresher in the latest BMS documents at the earliest convenience.

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    Outdated governing documents are accessible via SharePoint.

    Mark outdated versions of
    document on the front page / by watermarks or similar and/or put outdated versions in separate inaccessible folders.

    Agreed that we shall sort all outdated revisions in a “Secret/Closed folder”, and again emphasis towards our employees that the “Document register” is the best tool to use when searching for documents.
    29.11.22: All old versions of governing documents (business and services) are now made inaccessible for all employees (except Lars, Daniel and Anniken)

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    Need for a clearer definition of minor, significant and major MoC.
    No examples of what this may entail in different project phases are given.

    In WE-M-QHSE-P-01 – How WE
    Manage Risk and Change, chapter 8.1. – clarify by providing example of what facilitates a minor, significant, and major change in different project phases as e.g., rig
    move, operation, logistics, planning.
    These could also be used as basis for discussion with the operator, to achieve a shared understanding.

    WE have agreed on a new risk matrix (same as for NC and incident reporting). The MoC module needs to be updated.
    We do not see a need for providing examples of minor, significant or major changes, as the new risk matrix is very clear and intuitive.

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    It’s not clear if required courses and training programs
    in the competence matrix are required as a result of
    governmental requirements or internal requirements.

    Need for a consistent description of the unacceptable risk level throughout the document WE-M-QHSE-P-01 – How WE
    Manage Risk and Change chapter 7.1.1, 7.1.2 & App. A, It should be in line with the Risk Matrix definitions.

    29.04.22: Competence matrix is updated, but How WE Manage Risk and Change, and how WE resource projects need to be updated. These are registered as new imp. suggestions.



Additional Documentation

Well-Expertise-revisjon-for-Petrolia-Noco-Rapport-1074378-RE-02-Final.pdf


Well-Expertise-revisjon-for-Petrolia-Noco-Rapport-1074378-RE-02-Final.pdf



\n”}}]}]}]},{“type”:”section”,”props”:{“class”:”uk-hidden”,”id”:”newreport”,”image_position”:”center-center”,”padding”:”none”,”style”:”default”,”title_breakpoint”:”xl”,”title_position”:”top-left”,”title_rotation”:”left”,”vertical_align”:””,”width”:”default”},”children”:[{“type”:”row”,”children”:[{“type”:”column”,”props”:{“image_position”:”center-center”,”position_sticky_breakpoint”:”m”},”children”:[{“type”:”html”,”props”:{“content”:”

\n

\n

New Audit Report