WE Report

Audits


Mitsui

No person selected

Report No.

1694
Mitsui Delivery Process – Well Management
Type of audit

External Audits
Mitsui
Auditee/Customer

Mitsui
Wellesley Petroleum AS

Date

2020/08/10

1947 days ago
Findings

4
Number of findings
Status

Closed
External Audits


Mitsui Delivery Process – Well Management
Summary

The verification was held at Mitsui premises in Florø 10 of August, and relevant personnel from Mitsui Management, SCMS, Wellesley and WE were present
All persons involved from Mitsui and SCMS were helpful and positive during the verification.
The verification started with an opening meeting were Wellesley/presented the Schweinsteiger project and scope for the verification. Then, Mitsui presented the different topics requested in the notification letter, followed up by questions from Wellesley/WE. A site visit at the Fjordbase was then carried out after the meeting. The verification was summarised and findings presented in the closing meeting at the end of the day.
The verification team identified four (4) findings, which included two (2) observations and two (2) improvement points. The findings are described in chapter 4 and summed up in an action list for follow up in chapter 5. The overall impression of the verification was positive and none of the findings were considered critical for the Schweinsteiger operation.

Findings

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    A QMS bridging document between Mitsui and SCM was not prepared

    Prepare a QMS bridging document between Mitsui and SCMS

    ok

    Åse Kristin Pettersen

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    A Quality Plan for the contract was not prepared

    Prepare a Quality plan for the contract

    ok

    Åse Kristin Pettersen

  • Improvement

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    A procedure for handling changes should be prepared (MOC)

    Prepare a MOC procedure for how to handle changes

    ok

    Åse Kristin Pettersen

  • Improvement

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    The quality manual and some other procedures received is does not have proper identification, such as Company name and document no.

    Prepare a document coding procedure that describes how documents should be identified

    ok

    Åse Kristin Pettersen



Additional Documentation

EA-2020-5_Verification-Report-Mitsui.pdf


EA-2020-5_Verification-Report-Mitsui.pdf




New Audit Report

You do not have permission to view this form.

Cancel
Save Draft
Submit




\n

Mitsui

No person selected

Report No.

1694
Mitsui Delivery Process – Well Management
Type of audit

External Audits
Mitsui
Auditee/Customer

Mitsui
Wellesley Petroleum AS

Date

2020/08/10

1947 days ago
Findings

4
Number of findings
Status

Closed
External Audits


Mitsui Delivery Process – Well Management
Summary

The verification was held at Mitsui premises in Florø 10 of August, and relevant personnel from Mitsui Management, SCMS, Wellesley and WE were present
All persons involved from Mitsui and SCMS were helpful and positive during the verification.
The verification started with an opening meeting were Wellesley/presented the Schweinsteiger project and scope for the verification. Then, Mitsui presented the different topics requested in the notification letter, followed up by questions from Wellesley/WE. A site visit at the Fjordbase was then carried out after the meeting. The verification was summarised and findings presented in the closing meeting at the end of the day.
The verification team identified four (4) findings, which included two (2) observations and two (2) improvement points. The findings are described in chapter 4 and summed up in an action list for follow up in chapter 5. The overall impression of the verification was positive and none of the findings were considered critical for the Schweinsteiger operation.

Findings

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    A QMS bridging document between Mitsui and SCM was not prepared

    Prepare a QMS bridging document between Mitsui and SCMS

    ok

    Åse Kristin Pettersen

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    A Quality Plan for the contract was not prepared

    Prepare a Quality plan for the contract

    ok

    Åse Kristin Pettersen

  • Improvement

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    A procedure for handling changes should be prepared (MOC)

    Prepare a MOC procedure for how to handle changes

    ok

    Åse Kristin Pettersen

  • Improvement

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    The quality manual and some other procedures received is does not have proper identification, such as Company name and document no.

    Prepare a document coding procedure that describes how documents should be identified

    ok

    Åse Kristin Pettersen



Additional Documentation

EA-2020-5_Verification-Report-Mitsui.pdf


EA-2020-5_Verification-Report-Mitsui.pdf



\n”}}]}]}]},{“type”:”section”,”props”:{“class”:”uk-hidden”,”id”:”newreport”,”image_position”:”center-center”,”padding”:”none”,”style”:”default”,”title_breakpoint”:”xl”,”title_position”:”top-left”,”title_rotation”:”left”,”vertical_align”:””,”width”:”default”},”children”:[{“type”:”row”,”children”:[{“type”:”column”,”props”:{“image_position”:”center-center”,”position_sticky_breakpoint”:”m”},”children”:[{“type”:”html”,”props”:{“content”:”

\n

\n

New Audit Report

You do not have permission to view this form.