Safepath AS

|
Report No.
|
1792 |
|
Type of audit
|
External Audits |
|
Auditee/Customer
|
Safepath AS |
|
Date
|
2017/05/22 |
|
Findings
|
4 |
|
Status
|
Closed |
Verification Report Safepath AS
Summary
1. Ensure Safepath’s operational performance meets industry standards, Wellesley and Well Expertise
expectations. Assure internal Safepath processes behind HSE and operational performance are being
actively used as intended.
2. Ensure that Safepath have the capacity, resources and knowledge to provide Well Expertise and
Wellesley with the expected service levels and quality, given the current market conditions.
3. Verify Safepath have information required from Well Expertise and Wellesley to plan for 2017
operations.
4. Satisfy verification requirements for Wellesley and Well Expertise project execution
The audit was based on the following documents:
• GOMO: guidelines for marine operations
• Norsk Olje og Gass: Operations manual for offshore service vessels on NCS
• Well Expertise: Marine Operations
The following documentation was received from Safepath prior to the verification meeting:
• Safepath Marine Manual
• Styringssystem for Safepath AS
• Maritime Surveillance and Environmental Monitoring Service
• MTC Operasjonsmanual
Findings
-
Clarify scope of Safepath service delivery in planning
and operational phase. i.e. Emergency response
support; stateboard with area resource overview. OIM
support ship on collision course. Drills etc. Assess
benefit of introducing kick off meeting with customer as
part of planning. -
Clarify and define roles and responsibilities. Assess
need for requesting/documenting input/interfaces
required from operator as basis for planning
operations. -
Enterprise risk register; a risk register was not
requested/addressed in the meeting, however the verification team recommend that a collected overview
of risks associated with the company are identified and
documented in a company/enterprise risk register (if
not already in place.) -
Follow up of suppliers. Establish list over suppliers.
Define which have an influence on customer/project
delivery and assess criticality level. Follow up of
suppliers based on criticality level.
Additional Documentation
New Audit Report
\n
Safepath AS

|
Report No.
|
1792 |
|
Type of audit
|
External Audits |
|
Auditee/Customer
|
Safepath AS |
|
Date
|
2017/05/22 |
|
Findings
|
4 |
|
Status
|
Closed |
Verification Report Safepath AS
Summary
1. Ensure Safepath’s operational performance meets industry standards, Wellesley and Well Expertise
expectations. Assure internal Safepath processes behind HSE and operational performance are being
actively used as intended.
2. Ensure that Safepath have the capacity, resources and knowledge to provide Well Expertise and
Wellesley with the expected service levels and quality, given the current market conditions.
3. Verify Safepath have information required from Well Expertise and Wellesley to plan for 2017
operations.
4. Satisfy verification requirements for Wellesley and Well Expertise project execution
The audit was based on the following documents:
• GOMO: guidelines for marine operations
• Norsk Olje og Gass: Operations manual for offshore service vessels on NCS
• Well Expertise: Marine Operations
The following documentation was received from Safepath prior to the verification meeting:
• Safepath Marine Manual
• Styringssystem for Safepath AS
• Maritime Surveillance and Environmental Monitoring Service
• MTC Operasjonsmanual
Findings
-
Clarify scope of Safepath service delivery in planning
and operational phase. i.e. Emergency response
support; stateboard with area resource overview. OIM
support ship on collision course. Drills etc. Assess
benefit of introducing kick off meeting with customer as
part of planning. -
Clarify and define roles and responsibilities. Assess
need for requesting/documenting input/interfaces
required from operator as basis for planning
operations. -
Enterprise risk register; a risk register was not
requested/addressed in the meeting, however the verification team recommend that a collected overview
of risks associated with the company are identified and
documented in a company/enterprise risk register (if
not already in place.) -
Follow up of suppliers. Establish list over suppliers.
Define which have an influence on customer/project
delivery and assess criticality level. Follow up of
suppliers based on criticality level.
Additional Documentation