WE Report

Audits


WE

No person selected

Report No.

8442
Management Review for 2024
Type of audit

Internal Audits
WE
Auditee/Customer

WE

Date

2025/03/13

269 days ago
Findings

12
Number of findings
Status

In process
Internal Audits


Management Review for 2024
Summary

Management review for 2024 was held 13. March 2025 and agreed actions are listed here.

Findings

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    An IMP after DNO’s audit in November 2024 was to secure better follow-up of actions from the Management Review

    To follow-up the actions in WEReport

    All agreed actions registered in WEReport

    Anniken Meisler

    Completed: 20/03/2025

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    Agree with Lars Solvang on CV formats and how to easily store

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Anniken Meisler

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    As Magnet JQS is a platform that operators use to check suppliers, our site must reflect our business and services better

    Stig, Morten and Sigve to assist

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Anniken Meisler

  • Actions

    Open

    Open
    Deadline was:

    Publish statement on the Transparency Act by 01.06.25

    Use the one from 2024 as basis

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Anniken Meisler

  • Actions

    Open

    Open
    Deadline was:

    To be according to Magnet JQS requirements, actions need to be implemented to secure that WE work according to

    – Make a GAP towards the standard – Lars with support from the Management Team
    – Update «How WE Manage Information and Computer Technology” procedure – Lars/Anniken
    – Updated our Regulatory overview – Anniken

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Lars Solvang

  • Actions

    Open

    Open
    Deadline was:

    Secure update of the Enterprise risk register and use time to get familiar with the ESG risk register

    Conduct a risk meeting and secure regular info in management meetings

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Sigve Næsheim

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    Utilise HUMA better

    Implement job descriptions, competence matrix, new employment contracts and personnel handbook

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    There is still a need for “investing” in having different standards available through Standard.no

    Agree on when and what

    18.03.25: Contacted Standard Online to get an overview of standards we have available through our subscription

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Anniken Meisler

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    We must get better to require feedback from our clients on satisfaction on our deliveries in each project

    – Have a run-through of the template – Roel, Stig, Morten – Sigve QA
    – Secure storage of the ones we have received since 2017 – Morten
    – Secure feedback on ongoing and coming projects and that they are signed by us and client – DSIs

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Morten Laget

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    Update “How WE Contract and Manage Suppliers” with how WE handle Human rights and due dill towards suppliers

    Draft (rev. 05) started on 24.02.2025

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Morten Laget

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    For our suite of contracts: Issue RfQs and sign new FAs

    – Issue RfQ for Completion, OCTG, Drilling and PP&A Services Q2 valid for 26-28
    – Sign new FA with Baker, Odfjell, Hunting, Schlumberger

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Morten Laget

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Introduce project KO meetings and EoW check list in all projects

    DSIs are responsible for implementing this in their projects

    06.03.2025: Morten made a suggestion on how to kick off projects with a proposed check list, presentation and risk assessment. Team should be aligned on day 1 of the project to avoid any confusion with regards to deliverables or details. This should save time and make sure that we actually are one team moving toward solving the task together and also ensure that we are not moving out of scope without getting compensated.

    Sigve Næsheim






New Audit Report

You do not have permission to view this form.

Cancel
Save Draft
Submit




\n

WE

No person selected

Report No.

8442
Management Review for 2024
Type of audit

Internal Audits
WE
Auditee/Customer

WE

Date

2025/03/13

269 days ago
Findings

12
Number of findings
Status

In process
Internal Audits


Management Review for 2024
Summary

Management review for 2024 was held 13. March 2025 and agreed actions are listed here.

Findings

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    An IMP after DNO’s audit in November 2024 was to secure better follow-up of actions from the Management Review

    To follow-up the actions in WEReport

    All agreed actions registered in WEReport

    Anniken Meisler

    Completed: 20/03/2025

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    Agree with Lars Solvang on CV formats and how to easily store

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Anniken Meisler

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    As Magnet JQS is a platform that operators use to check suppliers, our site must reflect our business and services better

    Stig, Morten and Sigve to assist

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Anniken Meisler

  • Actions

    Open

    Open
    Deadline was:

    Publish statement on the Transparency Act by 01.06.25

    Use the one from 2024 as basis

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Anniken Meisler

  • Actions

    Open

    Open
    Deadline was:

    To be according to Magnet JQS requirements, actions need to be implemented to secure that WE work according to

    – Make a GAP towards the standard – Lars with support from the Management Team
    – Update «How WE Manage Information and Computer Technology” procedure – Lars/Anniken
    – Updated our Regulatory overview – Anniken

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Lars Solvang

  • Actions

    Open

    Open
    Deadline was:

    Secure update of the Enterprise risk register and use time to get familiar with the ESG risk register

    Conduct a risk meeting and secure regular info in management meetings

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Sigve Næsheim

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    Utilise HUMA better

    Implement job descriptions, competence matrix, new employment contracts and personnel handbook

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    There is still a need for “investing” in having different standards available through Standard.no

    Agree on when and what

    18.03.25: Contacted Standard Online to get an overview of standards we have available through our subscription

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Anniken Meisler

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    We must get better to require feedback from our clients on satisfaction on our deliveries in each project

    – Have a run-through of the template – Roel, Stig, Morten – Sigve QA
    – Secure storage of the ones we have received since 2017 – Morten
    – Secure feedback on ongoing and coming projects and that they are signed by us and client – DSIs

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Morten Laget

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    Update “How WE Contract and Manage Suppliers” with how WE handle Human rights and due dill towards suppliers

    Draft (rev. 05) started on 24.02.2025

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Morten Laget

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Deadline was:

    For our suite of contracts: Issue RfQs and sign new FAs

    – Issue RfQ for Completion, OCTG, Drilling and PP&A Services Q2 valid for 26-28
    – Sign new FA with Baker, Odfjell, Hunting, Schlumberger

    Deadline:

    :

    :

    :

    Morten Laget

  • Actions

    In Process

    In Process


    Introduce project KO meetings and EoW check list in all projects

    DSIs are responsible for implementing this in their projects

    06.03.2025: Morten made a suggestion on how to kick off projects with a proposed check list, presentation and risk assessment. Team should be aligned on day 1 of the project to avoid any confusion with regards to deliverables or details. This should save time and make sure that we actually are one team moving toward solving the task together and also ensure that we are not moving out of scope without getting compensated.

    Sigve Næsheim





\n”}}]}]}]},{“type”:”section”,”props”:{“class”:”uk-hidden”,”id”:”newreport”,”image_position”:”center-center”,”padding”:”none”,”style”:”default”,”title_breakpoint”:”xl”,”title_position”:”top-left”,”title_rotation”:”left”,”vertical_align”:””,”width”:”default”},”children”:[{“type”:”row”,”children”:[{“type”:”column”,”props”:{“image_position”:”center-center”,”position_sticky_breakpoint”:”m”},”children”:[{“type”:”html”,”props”:{“content”:”

\n

\n

New Audit Report

You do not have permission to view this form.