Saga Fjordbase have two procedures for the receipt and handling of materials and CCUs. According to
the “NOG-091 Appendix 4 Decision table” a certain percentage of CCUs shall be randomly selected and
checked. The Saga Fjordbase procedures differ in the named percentage (5 % and 10 %).
The verification team suggests Saga Fjordbase revise their procedures to reflect the correct number 5
%. Wellesley do not have any requirements for a higher percentage randomly selected CCUs.

On previous operations waste declarations have been changed/reclassified by SAR on www.
avfallsdeklarering.no after waste has been received onshore at supply base. (E.g. waste re-declared to
Oil Based Mud on operations where OBM hasn`t been used.)

The verification team suggests SAR look at their procedures for declaring waste and secure that
deviations or changes are discussed with the operator before changes are made at avfallsdeklarering.no. Then the operator is given the chance to discuss and check the declaration. If the waste
is incorrectly reported from offshore, a deviation report must be written and sent to operator before the
time limit for doing changes (10 days) is exceeded at avfallsdeklarering.no.

The fact that Saga Fjordbase is ISO 14001 certified does not come clearly across in the submitted
documentation.

The verification team suggests that Saga Fjordbase review the description of their Management system
and include ISO 14001 reference and environmental focus. For future verifications, submitting the ISO
certificates may be smart when sending requested information.

Ref. HMSK Plan 2017, page 8: How does Saga Fjordbase secure achievement of objectives
(måloppnåelse)?
The verification team thinks that achievement of goals/objectives should be part of the agenda under
‘Forbedringsprosjekt’. It is important that status on goals and objectives are communicated to ensure
that the personnel is aware of the goals and how each of them can contribute. It seems like this is
covered through meetings and also in personnel appraisals (‘medarbeidersamtaler’), so the
improvement suggestion is to update the HMSK Plan.

Saga Fjordbase do not have any procedures other than a written handover when going from normal
working hours and dedicated logistics coordinator, to duty personnel.

The verification team suggests Saga Fjordbase set up procedures where personnel overlap or have a
formal check list to ensure all personnel are familiar with upcoming operations.

Saga Fjordbase to consider audit/verification of Bring.

The verification team suggests Saga Fjordbase perform an audit/verification of Bring to ensure transport
for the Goanna well is performed in a safe and efficient manner. Wellesley to provide estimated
tonnage, information on CCUs and potential special transport for the coming operations.

Saga Fjordbase have two procedures for the receipt and handling of materials and CCUs. According to
the “NOG-091 Appendix 4 Decision table” a certain percentage of CCUs shall be randomly selected and
checked. The Saga Fjordbase procedures differ in the named percentage (5 % and 10 %).
The verification team suggests Saga Fjordbase revise their procedures to reflect the correct number 5
%. Wellesley do not have any requirements for a higher percentage randomly selected CCUs.

On previous operations waste declarations have been changed/reclassified by SAR on www.
avfallsdeklarering.no after waste has been received onshore at supply base. (E.g. waste re-declared to
Oil Based Mud on operations where OBM hasn`t been used.)

The verification team suggests SAR look at their procedures for declaring waste and secure that
deviations or changes are discussed with the operator before changes are made at avfallsdeklarering.no. Then the operator is given the chance to discuss and check the declaration. If the waste
is incorrectly reported from offshore, a deviation report must be written and sent to operator before the
time limit for doing changes (10 days) is exceeded at avfallsdeklarering.no.

The fact that Saga Fjordbase is ISO 14001 certified does not come clearly across in the submitted
documentation.

The verification team suggests that Saga Fjordbase review the description of their Management system
and include ISO 14001 reference and environmental focus. For future verifications, submitting the ISO
certificates may be smart when sending requested information.

Ref. HMSK Plan 2017, page 8: How does Saga Fjordbase secure achievement of objectives
(måloppnåelse)?
The verification team thinks that achievement of goals/objectives should be part of the agenda under
‘Forbedringsprosjekt’. It is important that status on goals and objectives are communicated to ensure
that the personnel is aware of the goals and how each of them can contribute. It seems like this is
covered through meetings and also in personnel appraisals (‘medarbeidersamtaler’), so the
improvement suggestion is to update the HMSK Plan.

Saga Fjordbase do not have any procedures other than a written handover when going from normal
working hours and dedicated logistics coordinator, to duty personnel.

The verification team suggests Saga Fjordbase set up procedures where personnel overlap or have a
formal check list to ensure all personnel are familiar with upcoming operations.

Saga Fjordbase to consider audit/verification of Bring.

The verification team suggests Saga Fjordbase perform an audit/verification of Bring to ensure transport
for the Goanna well is performed in a safe and efficient manner. Wellesley to provide estimated
tonnage, information on CCUs and potential special transport for the coming operations.