Well Expertise

|
Report No.
|
3414 |
|
Type of audit
|
Internal Audits |
|
Auditee/Customer
|
Well Expertise |
|
Date
|
2022/02/22 |
|
Findings
|
4 |
|
Status
|
Closed |
Well Management Services – Petrolia NOCO
Summary
The overall objective of the audit was to ensure that WE can deliver well management services with organizational robustness, necessary capacity, and competence to PNO
Findings
-
Area of responsibility, and competence requirements for
the role of marine representative in a well project are not described as required.Include the role of marine representative in the competence matrix so that the competence requirements can be clarified, and a formal competence assessment can be performed.
The area of responsibility for the role as marine representative in the governing document WE-M-PDP-MA-01 – How WE
Resource projects need to be
documented, to ensure that personnel are qualified for their role and are familiar with their main responsibilities in
a well project, and amend the mismatch in descriptions of
the Marine project role
where it is called Marine Operations Coordinator, and the project organisation chart role of Marine Advisor.Increase redundancy and robustness in Marine Advisor role by securing a backup resource. If external resource (MarineHub), include requirement for formal
induction, training, WE familiarization should be considered.Has included Rune Smenes (our stand-in Marine Advisor) in our Competence Matrix. Rune is a former employee of Well Expertise and has all the requirements needed to perform tasks as Marine Advisor. Rune is also familiar with the governing documents in Well Expertise, but do however, require a refresher in the latest BMS documents at the earliest convenience.
-
Outdated governing documents are accessible via SharePoint.
Mark outdated versions of
document on the front page / by watermarks or similar and/or put outdated versions in separate inaccessible folders.Agreed that we shall sort all outdated revisions in a “Secret/Closed folder”, and again emphasis towards our employees that the “Document register” is the best tool to use when searching for documents.
29.11.22: All old versions of governing documents (business and services) are now made inaccessible for all employees (except Lars, Daniel and Anniken) -
Need for a clearer definition of minor, significant and major MoC.
No examples of what this may entail in different project phases are given.In WE-M-QHSE-P-01 – How WE
Manage Risk and Change, chapter 8.1. – clarify by providing example of what facilitates a minor, significant, and major change in different project phases as e.g., rig
move, operation, logistics, planning.
These could also be used as basis for discussion with the operator, to achieve a shared understanding.WE have agreed on a new risk matrix (same as for NC and incident reporting). The MoC module needs to be updated.
We do not see a need for providing examples of minor, significant or major changes, as the new risk matrix is very clear and intuitive. -
It’s not clear if required courses and training programs
in the competence matrix are required as a result of
governmental requirements or internal requirements.Need for a consistent description of the unacceptable risk level throughout the document WE-M-QHSE-P-01 – How WE
Manage Risk and Change chapter 7.1.1, 7.1.2 & App. A, It should be in line with the Risk Matrix definitions.29.04.22: Competence matrix is updated, but How WE Manage Risk and Change, and how WE resource projects need to be updated. These are registered as new imp. suggestions.
Additional Documentation
Well-Expertise-revisjon-for-Petrolia-Noco-Rapport-1074378-RE-02-Final.pdf
New Audit Report
\n
Well Expertise

|
Report No.
|
3414 |
|
Type of audit
|
Internal Audits |
|
Auditee/Customer
|
Well Expertise |
|
Date
|
2022/02/22 |
|
Findings
|
4 |
|
Status
|
Closed |
Well Management Services – Petrolia NOCO
Summary
The overall objective of the audit was to ensure that WE can deliver well management services with organizational robustness, necessary capacity, and competence to PNO
Findings
-
Area of responsibility, and competence requirements for
the role of marine representative in a well project are not described as required.Include the role of marine representative in the competence matrix so that the competence requirements can be clarified, and a formal competence assessment can be performed.
The area of responsibility for the role as marine representative in the governing document WE-M-PDP-MA-01 – How WE
Resource projects need to be
documented, to ensure that personnel are qualified for their role and are familiar with their main responsibilities in
a well project, and amend the mismatch in descriptions of
the Marine project role
where it is called Marine Operations Coordinator, and the project organisation chart role of Marine Advisor.Increase redundancy and robustness in Marine Advisor role by securing a backup resource. If external resource (MarineHub), include requirement for formal
induction, training, WE familiarization should be considered.Has included Rune Smenes (our stand-in Marine Advisor) in our Competence Matrix. Rune is a former employee of Well Expertise and has all the requirements needed to perform tasks as Marine Advisor. Rune is also familiar with the governing documents in Well Expertise, but do however, require a refresher in the latest BMS documents at the earliest convenience.
-
Outdated governing documents are accessible via SharePoint.
Mark outdated versions of
document on the front page / by watermarks or similar and/or put outdated versions in separate inaccessible folders.Agreed that we shall sort all outdated revisions in a “Secret/Closed folder”, and again emphasis towards our employees that the “Document register” is the best tool to use when searching for documents.
29.11.22: All old versions of governing documents (business and services) are now made inaccessible for all employees (except Lars, Daniel and Anniken) -
Need for a clearer definition of minor, significant and major MoC.
No examples of what this may entail in different project phases are given.In WE-M-QHSE-P-01 – How WE
Manage Risk and Change, chapter 8.1. – clarify by providing example of what facilitates a minor, significant, and major change in different project phases as e.g., rig
move, operation, logistics, planning.
These could also be used as basis for discussion with the operator, to achieve a shared understanding.WE have agreed on a new risk matrix (same as for NC and incident reporting). The MoC module needs to be updated.
We do not see a need for providing examples of minor, significant or major changes, as the new risk matrix is very clear and intuitive. -
It’s not clear if required courses and training programs
in the competence matrix are required as a result of
governmental requirements or internal requirements.Need for a consistent description of the unacceptable risk level throughout the document WE-M-QHSE-P-01 – How WE
Manage Risk and Change chapter 7.1.1, 7.1.2 & App. A, It should be in line with the Risk Matrix definitions.29.04.22: Competence matrix is updated, but How WE Manage Risk and Change, and how WE resource projects need to be updated. These are registered as new imp. suggestions.
Additional Documentation
Well-Expertise-revisjon-for-Petrolia-Noco-Rapport-1074378-RE-02-Final.pdf