Saga Fjordbase

|
Report No.
|
5152 |
|
Type of audit
|
External Audits |
|
Auditee/Customer
|
Saga Fjordbase |
|
Date
|
2023/04/18 |
|
Findings
|
6 |
|
Status
|
Closed |
Saga Fjordbase Verification 2023
Summary
The verification was carried out by document verifications and by interviewing representatives from Saga Fjordbase, organised as a group interview meeting, at Saga Fjordbase’ s facilities in Florø. A visit in the workshop and tour around the premises was also conducted.
The verification was well facilitated by Saga Fjordbase and everyone participating were positive and open during the interviews.
The verification team identified 0 non-conformances, four (4) observations, one (1) improvement points, and one (1) action. None of the findings are critical for the operation. The findings are listed in chapter 4.
Saga Fjordbase is requested to respond within two weeks after receiving this report on how they intend to handle the findings and send Wellesley the required information.
Findings
-
0-1 One of the findings from the Magnet JQS audit was to consider minimum requirements for investigation team members, this is not described in the updated procedure or commented in the closure of the case. Responsible Ingvild Hovland
Specify minimum requirements for the investigation team.
Answer: We have updated procedure: «Deltagere skal ha gjennomført 40 timers HMS kurs eller tilsvarende. Minimum skal leder av granskningen skal ha gjennomført kurs innen granskning.»
-
0-2 The procedure “Granskning av alvorlige hendelser” is not according to the Management Regulation §20 or Cooperation for Safety’s guideline “029 Undersøkelse og granskning av HMS hendelser”. Responsible Ingvild Hovland
Update procedure accoding to the Management Regulation §20 or Cooperation for Safety’s guideline “029 Undersøkelse og granskning av HMS hendelser”.
Answer: We have updated procedure with a reference to recomended “SfS 029N/2020”
-
0-3 The procedure “Erfaringsoverføring og Læring” does not describe the use of Safety Alert, but the audit team has been informed that the procedure is currently on review. The procedure should include the use of safety alert and how to document the experience transfer for instance in IP. Responsible Ingvild Hovland
Answer: We have updated the procedure: «Ved alvorlige HMSSK hendelser, eller tilløp med høyt risikopotensial skal det utarbeides en Safety Alert etter gitt mal for informasjon internt og relevante eksterne aktører i same bransje. Safety Alert skal gjennomgås internt på avdelingsmøter, AMU, felles HMSSK møter»
-
0-4 There are four gaps in the competence matrix that should be closed before the operation. Responsible Christian Olsen.
Close gaps in the competence matrix
Answer: It’s a misunderstanding regarding clock symbol – this means certification is about to run out not a real GAP. This will help planning courses in front.
-
IMP-1 . The system for exemptions is paper based, the verification team recommends investigating if the Non-conformance module in IP could be used for internal and external exemptions. Responsible Ingvild Hovland
Consider using IP for Exemptions
Answer: We take this with us as an improvement of the system. It will be possible to make a new form in system called exemption. This must be done by system supplier.
-
A-1 Saga Fjordbase to send Presentation. Responsible Christian Olsen
Send presentation
Received
Additional Documentation
New Audit Report
\n
Saga Fjordbase

|
Report No.
|
5152 |
|
Type of audit
|
External Audits |
|
Auditee/Customer
|
Saga Fjordbase |
|
Date
|
2023/04/18 |
|
Findings
|
6 |
|
Status
|
Closed |
Saga Fjordbase Verification 2023
Summary
The verification was carried out by document verifications and by interviewing representatives from Saga Fjordbase, organised as a group interview meeting, at Saga Fjordbase’ s facilities in Florø. A visit in the workshop and tour around the premises was also conducted.
The verification was well facilitated by Saga Fjordbase and everyone participating were positive and open during the interviews.
The verification team identified 0 non-conformances, four (4) observations, one (1) improvement points, and one (1) action. None of the findings are critical for the operation. The findings are listed in chapter 4.
Saga Fjordbase is requested to respond within two weeks after receiving this report on how they intend to handle the findings and send Wellesley the required information.
Findings
-
0-1 One of the findings from the Magnet JQS audit was to consider minimum requirements for investigation team members, this is not described in the updated procedure or commented in the closure of the case. Responsible Ingvild Hovland
Specify minimum requirements for the investigation team.
Answer: We have updated procedure: «Deltagere skal ha gjennomført 40 timers HMS kurs eller tilsvarende. Minimum skal leder av granskningen skal ha gjennomført kurs innen granskning.»
-
0-2 The procedure “Granskning av alvorlige hendelser” is not according to the Management Regulation §20 or Cooperation for Safety’s guideline “029 Undersøkelse og granskning av HMS hendelser”. Responsible Ingvild Hovland
Update procedure accoding to the Management Regulation §20 or Cooperation for Safety’s guideline “029 Undersøkelse og granskning av HMS hendelser”.
Answer: We have updated procedure with a reference to recomended “SfS 029N/2020”
-
0-3 The procedure “Erfaringsoverføring og Læring” does not describe the use of Safety Alert, but the audit team has been informed that the procedure is currently on review. The procedure should include the use of safety alert and how to document the experience transfer for instance in IP. Responsible Ingvild Hovland
Answer: We have updated the procedure: «Ved alvorlige HMSSK hendelser, eller tilløp med høyt risikopotensial skal det utarbeides en Safety Alert etter gitt mal for informasjon internt og relevante eksterne aktører i same bransje. Safety Alert skal gjennomgås internt på avdelingsmøter, AMU, felles HMSSK møter»
-
0-4 There are four gaps in the competence matrix that should be closed before the operation. Responsible Christian Olsen.
Close gaps in the competence matrix
Answer: It’s a misunderstanding regarding clock symbol – this means certification is about to run out not a real GAP. This will help planning courses in front.
-
IMP-1 . The system for exemptions is paper based, the verification team recommends investigating if the Non-conformance module in IP could be used for internal and external exemptions. Responsible Ingvild Hovland
Consider using IP for Exemptions
Answer: We take this with us as an improvement of the system. It will be possible to make a new form in system called exemption. This must be done by system supplier.
-
A-1 Saga Fjordbase to send Presentation. Responsible Christian Olsen
Send presentation
Received
Additional Documentation