WE Report

Audits



Saga Fjordbase

No person selected

Report No.

5152
Saga Fjordbase Verification 2023

Type of audit

External Audits
Saga Fjordbase

Auditee/Customer

Saga Fjordbase
Wellesley

Date

2023/04/18

965 days ago

Findings

6
Number of findings

Status

Closed
External Audits


Saga Fjordbase Verification 2023
Summary

As part of the ongoing preparations for Wellesley’s exploration well “Carmen” a verification of Base Services at Saga Fjordbase in Florø was conducted 7th of March 2023. The objective was to verify the planning and readiness related to the SoW delivery for the Base services stated in the contract, ref. [1].
The verification was carried out by document verifications and by interviewing representatives from Saga Fjordbase, organised as a group interview meeting, at Saga Fjordbase’ s facilities in Florø. A visit in the workshop and tour around the premises was also conducted.
The verification was well facilitated by Saga Fjordbase and everyone participating were positive and open during the interviews.
The verification team identified 0 non-conformances, four (4) observations, one (1) improvement points, and one (1) action. None of the findings are critical for the operation. The findings are listed in chapter 4.
Saga Fjordbase is requested to respond within two weeks after receiving this report on how they intend to handle the findings and send Wellesley the required information.

Findings

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    0-1 One of the findings from the Magnet JQS audit was to consider minimum requirements for investigation team members, this is not described in the updated procedure or commented in the closure of the case. Responsible Ingvild Hovland

    Specify minimum requirements for the investigation team.

    Answer: We have updated procedure: «Deltagere skal ha gjennomført 40 timers HMS kurs eller tilsvarende. Minimum skal leder av granskningen skal ha gjennomført kurs innen granskning.»

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    0-2 The procedure “Granskning av alvorlige hendelser” is not according to the Management Regulation §20 or Cooperation for Safety’s guideline “029 Undersøkelse og granskning av HMS hendelser”. Responsible Ingvild Hovland

    Update procedure accoding to the Management Regulation §20 or Cooperation for Safety’s guideline “029 Undersøkelse og granskning av HMS hendelser”.

    Answer: We have updated procedure with a reference to recomended “SfS 029N/2020”

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    0-3 The procedure “Erfaringsoverføring og Læring” does not describe the use of Safety Alert, but the audit team has been informed that the procedure is currently on review. The procedure should include the use of safety alert and how to document the experience transfer for instance in IP. Responsible Ingvild Hovland

    Answer: We have updated the procedure: «Ved alvorlige HMSSK hendelser, eller tilløp med høyt risikopotensial skal det utarbeides en Safety Alert etter gitt mal for informasjon internt og relevante eksterne aktører i same bransje. Safety Alert skal gjennomgås internt på avdelingsmøter, AMU, felles HMSSK møter»

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    0-4 There are four gaps in the competence matrix that should be closed before the operation. Responsible Christian Olsen.

    Close gaps in the competence matrix

    Answer: It’s a misunderstanding regarding clock symbol – this means certification is about to run out not a real GAP. This will help planning courses in front.

  • Improvement

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    IMP-1 . The system for exemptions is paper based, the verification team recommends investigating if the Non-conformance module in IP could be used for internal and external exemptions. Responsible Ingvild Hovland

    Consider using IP for Exemptions

    Answer: We take this with us as an improvement of the system. It will be possible to make a new form in system called exemption. This must be done by system supplier.

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    A-1 Saga Fjordbase to send Presentation. Responsible Christian Olsen

    Send presentation

    Received



Additional Documentation

Verification-report-saga-Fjordbase-2023_-rev01-signed.pdf


Verification-report-saga-Fjordbase-2023_-rev01-signed.pdf




New Audit Report

You do not have permission to view this form.


\n


Saga Fjordbase

No person selected

Report No.

5152
Saga Fjordbase Verification 2023

Type of audit

External Audits
Saga Fjordbase

Auditee/Customer

Saga Fjordbase
Wellesley

Date

2023/04/18

965 days ago

Findings

6
Number of findings

Status

Closed
External Audits


Saga Fjordbase Verification 2023
Summary

As part of the ongoing preparations for Wellesley’s exploration well “Carmen” a verification of Base Services at Saga Fjordbase in Florø was conducted 7th of March 2023. The objective was to verify the planning and readiness related to the SoW delivery for the Base services stated in the contract, ref. [1].
The verification was carried out by document verifications and by interviewing representatives from Saga Fjordbase, organised as a group interview meeting, at Saga Fjordbase’ s facilities in Florø. A visit in the workshop and tour around the premises was also conducted.
The verification was well facilitated by Saga Fjordbase and everyone participating were positive and open during the interviews.
The verification team identified 0 non-conformances, four (4) observations, one (1) improvement points, and one (1) action. None of the findings are critical for the operation. The findings are listed in chapter 4.
Saga Fjordbase is requested to respond within two weeks after receiving this report on how they intend to handle the findings and send Wellesley the required information.

Findings

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    0-1 One of the findings from the Magnet JQS audit was to consider minimum requirements for investigation team members, this is not described in the updated procedure or commented in the closure of the case. Responsible Ingvild Hovland

    Specify minimum requirements for the investigation team.

    Answer: We have updated procedure: «Deltagere skal ha gjennomført 40 timers HMS kurs eller tilsvarende. Minimum skal leder av granskningen skal ha gjennomført kurs innen granskning.»

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    0-2 The procedure “Granskning av alvorlige hendelser” is not according to the Management Regulation §20 or Cooperation for Safety’s guideline “029 Undersøkelse og granskning av HMS hendelser”. Responsible Ingvild Hovland

    Update procedure accoding to the Management Regulation §20 or Cooperation for Safety’s guideline “029 Undersøkelse og granskning av HMS hendelser”.

    Answer: We have updated procedure with a reference to recomended “SfS 029N/2020”

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    0-3 The procedure “Erfaringsoverføring og Læring” does not describe the use of Safety Alert, but the audit team has been informed that the procedure is currently on review. The procedure should include the use of safety alert and how to document the experience transfer for instance in IP. Responsible Ingvild Hovland

    Answer: We have updated the procedure: «Ved alvorlige HMSSK hendelser, eller tilløp med høyt risikopotensial skal det utarbeides en Safety Alert etter gitt mal for informasjon internt og relevante eksterne aktører i same bransje. Safety Alert skal gjennomgås internt på avdelingsmøter, AMU, felles HMSSK møter»

  • Observation

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    0-4 There are four gaps in the competence matrix that should be closed before the operation. Responsible Christian Olsen.

    Close gaps in the competence matrix

    Answer: It’s a misunderstanding regarding clock symbol – this means certification is about to run out not a real GAP. This will help planning courses in front.

  • Improvement

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    IMP-1 . The system for exemptions is paper based, the verification team recommends investigating if the Non-conformance module in IP could be used for internal and external exemptions. Responsible Ingvild Hovland

    Consider using IP for Exemptions

    Answer: We take this with us as an improvement of the system. It will be possible to make a new form in system called exemption. This must be done by system supplier.

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    A-1 Saga Fjordbase to send Presentation. Responsible Christian Olsen

    Send presentation

    Received



Additional Documentation

Verification-report-saga-Fjordbase-2023_-rev01-signed.pdf


Verification-report-saga-Fjordbase-2023_-rev01-signed.pdf



\n”}}]}]}]},{“type”:”section”,”props”:{“class”:”uk-hidden”,”id”:”newreport”,”image_position”:”center-center”,”padding”:”none”,”style”:”default”,”title_breakpoint”:”xl”,”title_position”:”top-left”,”title_rotation”:”left”,”vertical_align”:””,”width”:”default”},”children”:[{“type”:”row”,”children”:[{“type”:”column”,”props”:{“image_position”:”center-center”,”position_sticky_breakpoint”:”m”},”children”:[{“type”:”html”,”props”:{“content”:”

\n

\n

New Audit Report