Mitsui
|
Report No.
|
982 |
|
Type of audit
|
External Audits |
|
Auditee/Customer
|
Mitsui |
|
Date
|
2020/08/10 |
|
Findings
|
4 |
|
Status
|
Closed |
Verification of Mitsui
Summary
All persons involved from Mitsui and SCMS were helpful and positive during the verification.
The verification started with an opening meeting were Wellesley/presented the Schweinsteiger project and scope for the verification. Then, Mitsui presented the different topics requested in the notification letter, followed up by questions from Wellesley/WE. A site visit at the Fjordbase was then carried out after the meeting. The verification was summarised and findings presented in the closing meeting at the end of the day.
The verification team identified four (4) findings, which included two (2) observations and two (2) improvement points. The findings are described in chapter 4 and summed up in an action list for follow up in chapter 5. The overall impression of the verification was positive and none of the findings were considered critical for the Schweinsteiger operation.
Findings
-
Observation
Closed
Deadline was:A QMS bridging document between Mitsui and SCM was not
preparedAction:
Prepare a bridging document between Mitsui and SCM.
Mitsui have prepared a brdiging document for HSE and one for QA, se attached.
-
Observation
Closed
Deadline was:A Quality Plan for the contract was not prepared
Action:
Prepare a Quality Plan for the project
Mail fra Mitsui: 2. Quality Plan for kontrakter.
Her vill vi gjerne gjøre et grundig jobb. Intensjonen var at den skulle være på plass innen neste brønn, på dette tidspunktet var ny brønn stipulert til mars/april, nå er tidspunktet endret til sent Q3 eller tidlig Q4. Nå skal vi fullføre QP i i løpet av Q2. Dette med bakgrunn med at SCMS sin ISO Sertifisering ikke var ferdig før januari 2021. Ergo vil Du ha denne QP i god tid innen oppstart.ÅKP: 09.04.2021 The contract is referring to a Quality plan. This is related to the production of new pipes. Pipes for the Hemispheres operation are not coming directly from production but storage area. The pipes are made according to the costumers requirements and a MPS/QCP is made before production. The material sheet for pipe is referring to the spesifications. Chapter 2 in the contract and App. A and is when new pipes are made. Case closed.
-
Improvement
Closed
Deadline was:A procedure for handling changes should be prepared (MOC)
Action:
Prepare a procedure for handling changes
Svar fra Mitsui: Vi har grundig sett på dette og mener at managment of change er en integrert del av alle vore systemer, QA, Hilse og Sikkerhet, Miljø, og kvalitets plan. Dermed er det ikke nødvendig at sette opp hen helt egen prosedyre. Hvis, det er et meget sterkt ønske kan vi gjøre det. Men det blir mest referenser til existerende dokument.
Men vi takker deg for at du har lyft frem dette. Dette da vi reviderer jo kontinuerlig våre systemer og det er klart at MOC kan og bør komme frem i disse systemer – mere prominente. Så dette bir utført vartefter vi reviderer styrings dokumenter. -
Observation
Closed
Deadline was:The quality manual and some other procedures received does not have proper identification, such as Company name and document no.
Governing document should have the proper identification such as company name and document number
The procedure for document control have been updated and will be followed. Se procdeure attached.
New Audit Report
\n
Mitsui
|
Report No.
|
982 |
|
Type of audit
|
External Audits |
|
Auditee/Customer
|
Mitsui |
|
Date
|
2020/08/10 |
|
Findings
|
4 |
|
Status
|
Closed |
Verification of Mitsui
Summary
All persons involved from Mitsui and SCMS were helpful and positive during the verification.
The verification started with an opening meeting were Wellesley/presented the Schweinsteiger project and scope for the verification. Then, Mitsui presented the different topics requested in the notification letter, followed up by questions from Wellesley/WE. A site visit at the Fjordbase was then carried out after the meeting. The verification was summarised and findings presented in the closing meeting at the end of the day.
The verification team identified four (4) findings, which included two (2) observations and two (2) improvement points. The findings are described in chapter 4 and summed up in an action list for follow up in chapter 5. The overall impression of the verification was positive and none of the findings were considered critical for the Schweinsteiger operation.
Findings
-
Observation
Closed
Deadline was:A QMS bridging document between Mitsui and SCM was not
preparedAction:
Prepare a bridging document between Mitsui and SCM.
Mitsui have prepared a brdiging document for HSE and one for QA, se attached.
-
Observation
Closed
Deadline was:A Quality Plan for the contract was not prepared
Action:
Prepare a Quality Plan for the project
Mail fra Mitsui: 2. Quality Plan for kontrakter.
Her vill vi gjerne gjøre et grundig jobb. Intensjonen var at den skulle være på plass innen neste brønn, på dette tidspunktet var ny brønn stipulert til mars/april, nå er tidspunktet endret til sent Q3 eller tidlig Q4. Nå skal vi fullføre QP i i løpet av Q2. Dette med bakgrunn med at SCMS sin ISO Sertifisering ikke var ferdig før januari 2021. Ergo vil Du ha denne QP i god tid innen oppstart.ÅKP: 09.04.2021 The contract is referring to a Quality plan. This is related to the production of new pipes. Pipes for the Hemispheres operation are not coming directly from production but storage area. The pipes are made according to the costumers requirements and a MPS/QCP is made before production. The material sheet for pipe is referring to the spesifications. Chapter 2 in the contract and App. A and is when new pipes are made. Case closed.
-
Improvement
Closed
Deadline was:A procedure for handling changes should be prepared (MOC)
Action:
Prepare a procedure for handling changes
Svar fra Mitsui: Vi har grundig sett på dette og mener at managment of change er en integrert del av alle vore systemer, QA, Hilse og Sikkerhet, Miljø, og kvalitets plan. Dermed er det ikke nødvendig at sette opp hen helt egen prosedyre. Hvis, det er et meget sterkt ønske kan vi gjøre det. Men det blir mest referenser til existerende dokument.
Men vi takker deg for at du har lyft frem dette. Dette da vi reviderer jo kontinuerlig våre systemer og det er klart at MOC kan og bør komme frem i disse systemer – mere prominente. Så dette bir utført vartefter vi reviderer styrings dokumenter. -
Observation
Closed
Deadline was:The quality manual and some other procedures received does not have proper identification, such as Company name and document no.
Governing document should have the proper identification such as company name and document number
The procedure for document control have been updated and will be followed. Se procdeure attached.